From kfogel@phylo.life.uiuc.edu (Karl Fogel) Fri Jul  8 21:50:05 1994
Path: doc.ic.ac.uk!aixssc.uk.ibm.com!ibm.de!Munich.Germany.EU.net!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!phylo.life.uiuc.edu!kfogel
From: kfogel@phylo.life.uiuc.edu (Karl Fogel)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
Subject: Incorrect value of pi
Date: 7 Jul 1994 18:32:45 -0400
Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
Lines: 14
Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu
Approved: bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu
Distribution: gnu
Message-ID: <199407071708.AA04797@phylo.life.uiuc.edu>

In GNU Emacs 19.25.8 of Mon Jul  4 1994 on phylo (sparc-sun-sunos4.1.3)

        pi's value is reported as 3.1415926535897931, the correct
value is 3.1415926535897932.  The next digit would be a 3; in any
case, though, there is no reason to round the 2 down to a 1.

        Thanks to Bryan O'Sullivan for pointing this out.

        People cannot use Emacs to reliably calculate the
circumference of the universe until this is fixed.

Thank you,
Karl Fogel


From ethanb@ptolemy.astro.washington.edu (Ethan Bradford) Fri Jul  8 21:50:20 1994
Path: doc.ic.ac.uk!aixssc.uk.ibm.com!ibm.de!Munich.Germany.EU.net!Germany.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!convex!news.duke.edu!eff!news.umbc.edu!haven.umd.edu!purdue!lerc.nasa.gov!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ptolemy.astro.washington.edu!ethanb
From: ethanb@ptolemy.astro.washington.edu (Ethan Bradford)
Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
Subject: Re: Incorrect value of pi
Date: 8 Jul 1994 13:30:24 -0400
Organization: University of Washington
Lines: 10
Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu
Approved: bug-gnu-emacs@prep.ai.mit.edu
Distribution: gnu
Message-ID: <ETHANB.94Jul7170837@ptolemy.phys.washington.edu>
References: <199407071708.AA04797@phylo.life.uiuc.edu>
Reply-To: ethanb@u.washington.edu

In article <199407071708.AA04797@phylo.life.uiuc.edu> kfogel@phylo.life.uiuc.edu (Karl Fogel) writes:

>         pi's value is reported as 3.1415926535897931, the correct
> value is 3.1415926535897932.  The next digit would be a 3; in any
> case, though, there is no reason to round the 2 down to a 1.

The rounding down is due to machine precision.  Type ESC ESC and enter
the more precise value; it will be echoed to you as the less precise
one.


